On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that official documents would no longer be self-ratifying under this > proposal. Is this deliberate, and if so, why is it a good idea? (If a > document can be "secretly published" ala Rule 9999, then its author can > probably use the same mechanism to secretly declare intent to ratify, so it > doesn't really work as a safety valve.)
They're not currently self-ratifying either, apart from the lists of assets in the reports of the Accountor, Conductor, Scorekeepor, and Tailor. -root