On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > > 5441 5442 5443 5444 5445 > > > >BobTHJ A 4A A > > Claim of error: BobTHJ cannot have cast votes on these proposals, > because e was not an eligible voter due to not being a player at the > start of the voting period.
Blah. I think I have a mental block against acknowledging that possibility. > BobTHJ's votes don't change any of the outcomes. I suggest that you just > conditionally resolve them again, omitting BobTHJ's votes, so that the > ambiguity is only one of timing. And while the uncertainty continues, > I suggest that you do both resolutions in the same message for future > batches. Then what, may I ask, was the point in issuing the claim of error? -root
