On 14:35 Fri 15 Feb , Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1906 > > ========================= Criminal Case 1906 ========================= > > comex violated rule 2149 by claiming in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > that proposal 5419 passed while not believing that to be true. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Zefram > Barred: comex > > Judge: pikhq > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Zefram: 08 Feb 2008 17:02:02 GMT > Defendant comex informed: 08 Feb 2008 21:46:58 GMT > Pre-trial phase ended: 15 Feb 2008 21:46:58 GMT > Assigned to pikhq: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > CFJ 1893 has found that proposal 5419 was rejected, and there has been > no call for its appeal. comex is presumably well aware of this. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >From: comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 5418-5422 > >Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:51:22 -0500 > > > >On 2/2/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> x5419 D1 3 comex Generalize Game Actions > >Claim of error: I claim that this proposal passed, in order to prolong > >its self-ratification for a bit (there is a reason for this). > > ========================================================================
I recuse myself from thise case. As can be seen by my suggestions that comex be punished quite severely over this, I cannot be considered a reasonable, impartial judge for this, and therefore prefer not to judge it.
