> Proposal 5445 (Democratic, AI=3, Interest=1) by Goethe, Murphy > Satisfaction v3 Upon finally reading through this carefully, I wish I'd paid more attention to its proto thread -- sorry Goethe. I'm not sure whether any of these issues justify voting AGAINST, so I'll just go to a-d for a while.
> At it worked. Limited scamming, and limited mistakes. "And it worked." > (b) either the performer was the initiator, or the initiator > was authorized to perform the action by virtue of holding > a rules-defined position and the performer is the holder > of that position when e attempts to perform the action; > and Is this restriction really necessary, particularly for actions With N Support? It seems that the four-day minimum in (a) would take care of timing scams pretty well. > A Supporter of a dependent action is a first-class player > who has publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support for an > announcement of intent to perform the action. An Objector to > a dependent action is a first-class player who has publicly > posted (and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement > of intent to perform the action. s/publicly posted/published Append: Publishing support for an announcement of intent implicitly withdraws any previously published objection to that announcement, and publishing objection to an announcement of intent implicitly withdraws any previously published support for that announcement. > (3) the action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, > and the ratio of supporters to objectors is greater than > N, or the action has at least one supporter and no > objectors. This may lose the benefit of the 0/0=0 feature of index arithmetic. (clearly not enough of a) watcher
