This seems long and cumbersome, two full decisions. Maybe the initial
vote should be Agoran Consent (same 2/3 majority index?). You should
also re-write the first decision to be enabling as well as requiring,
in other words "if the outcome is APPROVED, the IADoP CAN and SHALL as
soon as possible initiate..."
-Goethe
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I revise my proposal titled Ostracism v2 as follows:
>
> Ostracism v2
> AI: 2
> II: 1
> Zefram is the co-author of this proposal
> {
> Create a new rule titled "Ostracism" with power = 2 and the text:
> {{
> As soon as possible after the beginning of each month the IADoP SHALL
> initiate an dependent action to ostracize with a Majority Index of
> 2/3. If the outcome is APPROVED, the IADoP shall as soon as possible
> initiate an agoran decision to determine who is ostracized. For this
> decision, the valid options are the players, the eligible voters are
> the active first-class players, quorum is 1/2 the number of eligible voters
> (rounded down), and the vote collector is the IADoP.
> }}
> }
>
> BobTHJ
>
