> >      A province is a registered protectorate.
>
> Be careful about the word "registered".  We've seen a recent case claiming
> that it can only refer to playerhood.

That was in fact what I meant. If a registered partnership's backing document
allows self-amendment, it qualifies as a nomic and is thus able to fulfill
the R2147 requirements for the ambassador to make it a protectorate with
Agoran Consent.

A registered protectorate has very much the relationship of a province to
Agora: submission to the national government, but a voice in that government
as well.


I thought of something else, though.

>      A nomic is an entity defined by a set of explicit rules that
>      provide means for themselves to be altered arbitrarily, including
>      changes to those rules which govern rule changes.

Does this definition require *each rule* to provide for self-amendment, or (as
intended) only the set as a whole? And can it be rewritten to remove the
ambiguity?

>      A nomic is an entity defined by a set (its ruleset) of explicit rules
>      such that the ruleset provides means for itself to be altered
>      arbitrarily, including changes to those rules that govern rule changes.

Clunky and therefore prone to deliberate misinterpretation (hi comex). Maybe:

>      A nomic ruleset is a set of explicit rules that provides means for
>      itself to be altered arbitrarily, including changes to (or repeals of)
>      those rules that govern rule changes.
>
>      A nomic is an entity defined by a nomic ruleset.

That should do it. I hope.
Er, no, wait -- Suber's immutables. Distinguish theoretically
unchangeable rules from momentarily immutable but downmutable rules.

>      A nomic ruleset is a set of explicit rules that provides some means for
>      itself to be altered arbitrarily in finite time, including changes to
>      (or repeals of) those rules that govern rule changes. These means may
>      require an arbitrarily complex combination of actions, but if any
>      change is theoretically impossible by any combination of actions, then
>      the set is disqualified from being a nomic ruleset.
>
>      A nomic is an entity defined by a nomic ruleset.

... And now it's unreadable again.

Reply via email to