This is complete now. Please treat this as pre-emptive gratuituous evidence that I believe these timestamps to accurately represent the Date: headers of the relevant messages. At the same time, feel free to check for errors. Meanwhile, I'm now going to work on figuring out the simplest way to feed these into the 'events' table.
"Reform" refers to 1 Aug 2007, the approximate time when Zefram's judicial reform proposal was adopted (changing initiation of appeal from "automatically on third call for appeal" to "with 2 support", and resolution from "automatically on third appeal judge's decision" to "upon panel action"). Appeal Opened Closed 1684a Pre-reform As block 1711a As block Tue 9 Oct 00:47:11 1711b Sun 21 Oct 17:33:22 Mon 22 Oct 19:54:16 1714a As block Tue 7 Aug 05:31:11 1740a Already OK Sat 22 Sep 17:37:00 1745a Wed 19 Sep 17:41:34 Mon 29 Oct 01:05:41 1748a Thu 4 Oct 16:03:45 Sun 21 Oct 19:03:13 1777a Mon 12 Nov 00:25:51 Sun 18 Nov 05:11:45 1786a Already OK Thu 29 Nov 01:38:06 1787a Sun 11 Nov 09:13:08 Tue 13 Nov 17:26:24 1799a Thu 29 Nov 01:47:01 Wed 5 Dec 17:47:07 1805a Wed 28 Nov 16:09:09 Wed 5 Dec 17:47:07 1806a Fri 30 Nov 04:34:12 Sat 1 Dec 03:44:51 1807a Fri 30 Nov 17:00:24 Mon 3 Dec 19:13:10 1812a Already OK Wed 5 Dec 16:15:56 1828a Already OK Mon 14 Jan 23:10:58 1830a Mon 10 Dec 07:46:56 Wed 12 Dec 18:35:14 1831a Mon 10 Dec 20:34:09 Wed 12 Dec 02:26:24 1831b Thu 20 Dec 20:26:16 Sun 20 Jan 04:18:29 1836a Thu 20 Dec 07:08:04 Fri 21 Dec 14:17:55 1836b Tue 1 Jan 01:37:25 Mon 7 Jan 20:02:43 1837a Already OK Fri 21 Dec 04:31:41 1838a Already OK Fri 21 Dec 04:31:41 1840a Thu 20 Dec 21:12:56 Mon 7 Jan 20:14:02 1846a Wed 26 Dec 05:15:46 Mon 7 Jan 19:31:11 1849a Already OK Mon 21 Jan 01:27:57 1857a Already OK Mon 14 Jan 03:20:18 1858a Already OK Mon 14 Jan 03:20:18 1860a Fri 11 Jan 01:05:02 Mon 14 Jan 23:00:44 1863a Tue 15 Jan 00:22:27 Mon 21 Jan 03:21:06 1870a Tue 15 Jan 01:31:04 Tue 15 Jan 06:31:36 1879a Already OK Not closed yet 1882a Tue 29 Jan 22:38:05 Wed 30 Jan 23:00:31 1896a Already OK Already OK "As block" means that individual actions (intent to initiate appeal, support for initiating appeal, intent to cause panel to act, consent for causing panel to act) have the same timestamp as the collective action (which is thus correct). For later events, individual actions are timestamped when they occurred. For all post-reform events, individual actions not leading to a collective action are omitted. For all panel recusals, only the members of the old panel that were not members of the new panel are recorded as being recused, and only the members of the new panel that were not members of the old panel are recorded as being assigned. On 1711a, IIRC comex and pikhq were ineffectively assigned (due to comex being supine), then consented, then were effectively assigned, so the order of events will end up looking weird even after things are fixed (because the ineffective assignment will remain omitted).
