On Feb 6, 2008 1:59 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the easiest thing is to combine these issues: leave N alone (get > rid of N+1) and disqualify the "first-class person who posts the intent, > or who posts the intent on behalf of a second-class person" from supporting.
In theory, the PerlNomic Partnership doesn't have a first-class person acting on its behalf, although it hasn't attempted any game actions other than registering and seems unlikely to do so in the very near future.