On Feb 6, 2008 1:59 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the easiest thing is to combine these issues:  leave N alone (get
> rid of N+1) and disqualify the "first-class person who posts the intent,
> or who posts the intent on behalf of a second-class person" from supporting.

In theory, the PerlNomic Partnership doesn't have a first-class person
acting on its behalf, although it hasn't attempted any game actions
other than registering and seems unlikely to do so in the very near
future.

Reply via email to