Wooble wrote:
I submit the following Proposal, with AI = 2, entitled "Judicial Immunity":
In Rule 2158, replace "SHALL" with "SHOULD".
This rule contains "SHALL" twice: for assigning an appropriate
judgement, and for the CotC recusing judges more than a week late.
Regarding the first instance: A judge who intentionally assigns
an inappropriate judgement should be subject to prosecution. A
judge who assigns a judgement that e believes in good faith is
appropriate, but later turns out to be inappropriate, should (per
CFJ 1863) be either UNAWARE (if eir error is a matter of fact) or
EXCUSED (if it is a matter of interpretation).
