> comex's non-binding agreement 'X' is a contract.
Proto-judgement: FALSE. a "non-binding contract" is a contradiction in legal terms, and a meaningless semantic construct. R1742, and R2169, both explicitly and explicitly link the concept of "contract" with the concept of it being binding in law. Further, the primary definition of "Contract" (M-W online) is: "a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties; especially : one legally enforceable". By both common definition and Agoran Law, a contract is a contract only as long as it is binding, and when it ceases to be binding (or if it never binding), it ceases to be legally enforceable, or have a legal impact on the Rules (for example, it ceases to govern delegations, powers of Attorney, devolution of obligations, transfer of rights and/or duties). -Goethe
