On Feb 2, 2008 9:44 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be good to know what exactly makes an agreement binding, anyways... > Since the contract in question didn't seem to ever impose any obligations on > comex, if imposing obligations is necessary for a contract to be binding on > someone, then the contract in question may have not been made "intention that > it be binding upon" both the AFO and comex.
But in that case, I wouldn't have been able to form, say, the contract referenced in CFJ 1833 which, similarly, only had a clause allowing X to act on behalf of Y.
