comex wrote:
With agreement from the AFO, and as allowed by Rule 1742 I modify X by changing its set of parties to: {comex, AFO, avpx, BobTHJ, Goddess Eris, Goethe, hedgehogcull, Iammars, Jeremy, Levi, Murphy, OscarMeyr, Pavitra, Peekee, pikhq, root, woggle, Wooble, Zefram}I argue that this is valid because R1742 doesn't restrict how I can change the set of parties, and most importantly, because X is not binding, thus not a binding agreement and so R101 (iv) doesn't apply. I have a full set of arguments for this that I will finish and post when I'm less tired.
The rules do not explicitly grant us the right to refuse, but neither do they explicitly grant you the right to draft. Since the agreement is non-binding, we are not bound to recognize its claims as legally effective, any more than the non-parties of Fookiemyartug were bound to recognize its claims wrt "nkep".
