On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > I think "by announcement" is effectively implied. (And fear that > interpreting otherwise might produce some tedious cascade effects > from my use of Default Officeholder last month, though maybe they've > all been papered over via self-ratification by now.)
Wasn't there a whole lot of discussions and a couple CFJs at one point to the effect that it wasn't implied (after all, you could assign things privately). I remember long discussions with Maud about 2 years ago but I can't recall if any cases came out of it. -Goethe
