On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, comex wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 9:16 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, I think I have to do it: COE denied on both pikhq and comex >> holding the patent title scamster (no evidence for pikhq, for comex, >> the first voting results for 5282 reported adoption, but the proposal >> actually failed (was corrected immediately after). > > Ohhh.... now I remember. OK, back to the awarding-myself-scamster idea then.
Shouldn't your line here be "CURSES! FOILED AGAIN!"? -Goethe
