On Tuesday 29 January 2008 17:04:08 Ben Caplan wrote: > > > R2144 only applies to partnerships with identical bases. I'm also > > > concerned about overlapping non-identical bases. > > > > Aha, so e.g. 3 players could create and register 4 partnerships > > (AB, AC, BC, ABC), and it gets worse as the number of conspirators > > increases. Would it suffice to prevent a partnership from standing > > up if any member of its basis is also a member of the basis of a > > standing player? > > I think that something like this issue has been true for voting on > proposals for some time now. Frankly, I'm a little surprised it hasn't been > scammed yet. (Or has it? If it had, I would have assumed it would have been > patched in legislation...) > > watcher
It's not that much of a bug, actually; you'd still need to spend notes to increase the VVLOP of each partnership, so you gain no votes by doing this. However, you *do* end up getting more notes per proposal. . .
