On Thursday 24 January 2008 20:05:13 comex wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 9:41 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "This rule takes precedence over all other rules." is needlessly > > redundant; the only other Power 4 rule is the Fountain. CFJs have > > determined that you need not hail Eris, so you're good. ;) > > Not necessarily. Let's say I wanted to violate someone's R101 rights. > R101 "takes precedence over any rule which would allow restrictions > of a person's rights or privileges. While, if I tried to violate > those rights, R1482 would say that my rule wins, you could argue that > R1482 is then "allow[ing] restrictions of a person's rights" and so > R101 claims to take precedence over it. > > Hmmm, although on second thought, this just ends up in the 'case of > problematic precedence' section. My rule's claim would just mix the > situation up further, not resolve it.
Your proposed rule is power 4. R101 is power 3. So, your proposed rule takes precedence over R101.
