On Monday 21 January 2008 19:45:09 Levi Stephen wrote: > Josiah Worcester wrote: > > On Monday 21 January 2008 19:37:28 Ian Kelly wrote: > >> On Jan 21, 2008 7:21 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> I intend to ratify my message alleging to announce the voting results > >>>> of proposals 5390-5404. > >>> > >>> Support: me (implicitly) > >>> Object: none > >>> > >>> I hereby ratify the message described above. > >> > >> This doesn't work, because the voting results aren't part of an official > >> report. > >> > >> -root > > > > However, my claim of error was denied, and the document has not been > > challenged since. So, the voting results self-ratified. > > I would say even that is not certain. As Murphy was not assessor at the > time it could be claimed it wasn't a valid publication in the first > place. e.g., if I published voting results, they wouldn't self-ratify > (well, I assume they wouldn't). > > Levi
Worse. They aren't described as self-ratifying.
