On Jan 14, 2008 5:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure. If an argument is coincidentally the right judgement > but for the wrong reasons, and is corrected in arguments either through > a concurring opinion or a new judgement, the original judgment might be > considered inappropriate anyway, as it didn't demonstrate the "if X" part > of the "appropriate if X" construction in R591.
R2158 doesn't require em to demonstrate that eir judgement is appropriate, only to assign one that is. -root
