On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, comex wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008 3:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (on the Rules if not on the database) > What?
If a program scanned emails for a CFJ, and when detected, automatically took the CFJ, scanned the eligibility list, and emailed out an judge assignment without human intervention, I don't doubt someone would craft a CFJ to get a broken, illegal, or weird assignment mailed back, a large number of trival CFJs assiged, or do something against the rules in a way that screwed up the game state somehow. I'd personally try to write a self-replicating CFJ, and I'm sure everyone else here would think of doing the same. Hence, an insertion attack "on the Rules" if not on the database. -Goethe
