root wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007 12:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like the idea, but this highlights an abuse of the language that has
long been overlooked. I suggest "in a timely fashion before" and "in a
timely fashion against".
I meant to write "in a timely fashion after" here.
I don't want to amend half the ruleset. If we were to keep ASAP as it
is and define "in a timely fashion" to mean the same thing, would that
work?
I suppose so.
Also, how should this interact with the Dec08/Jan09 holiday?
Good question. I'm tempted to just let the normal holiday rule cover
it, but it should probably allow the action to be performed as early
as a week before the beginning of the holiday.
The normal holiday rule would allow it to be delayed until 3 days after
the end of the holiday, same as now.
