On Jan 7, 2008 5:15 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2008 17:11:01 Ian Kelly wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 2008 2:44 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I judge TRUE. Steve Wallace wasn't a protectorate, so protective decrees > > > can't be issued to it. > > > > I intend to appeal this with two support. Rule 2159 only prohibits > > making such claims "to any nomic". The judge has made no argument as > > to whether Steve Wallace is a nomic, and I firmly believe that e is > > not. > > > > -root > > My apologies. Not a criminal case, so I can't appeal it directly. I support > this intent to appeal. > > I post the following per the Vote Market agreement:
Sell Ticket Action: SUPPORT each appeal of CFJ 1844. Cost: 2 VP BobTHJ
