On Jan 2, 2008 11:35 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > > Who's going to track this? Personhood is relevant not just for > > deregistration purposes, but also for successfully initiating inquiry > > cases, e.g. > > Main goal was to take care of those who have never posted (e.g. new silent > partners). > > Maybe better to make it the pragmatic, like inactivity, without messing > with personhood: "If one or more of the members of a registered partnership > have not posted publicly for N days, that partnership can be deregistered > [optional: with Support]." > How would we know? Also, this does not prevent current players from joining partnerships secretly.
BobTHJ
