On Wednesday 02 January 2008 11:13:05 Josiah Worcester wrote: > I Call for Judgement on the following: Dependent actions with fewer than > Quorum voters have not been made since clause (a) of rule 955 was made to > have its current text, except for the self-ratification of the voting > results. > Evidence: > (a) If there is more than one available option, and the number > of distinct voters who submitted valid ballots is less than > quorum, then the outcome is FAILED QUORUM, regardless of the > remainder of this rule. Otherwise, the decision achieved > quorum. > Evidence: > Quorum for an Agoran decision is N/3 (where N is the number of > eligible voters with a positive voting limit on that decision), > rounded up, with a minimum of five (unless this is greater than > N, in which case quorum is N, or the decision is whether to > approve a dependent action, in which case quorum is zero). > > Arguments: > All such decisions have failed quorum. The only way such votes are legitimate > is due to self-ratification. >
Further evidence: (from rule 1728) (b) The available options are SUPPORT and OBJECT.