Eris wrote:
On 12/31/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Dec 25, 2007 6:27 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:With agreement, I would like to have the panel judge REASSIGN. I think a fresh look on this would be valuableI agree to this.I'll do it after the Holiday to avoid giving the CotC a headache.
And to avoid violating Rule 2157 (by causing the panel to violate its obligation not to violate Rule 1769). Ugh, now I have a headache, and you probably do too.