Eris wrote:

On 12/31/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 6:27 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With agreement, I would like to have the panel judge REASSIGN. I think
a fresh look on this would be valuable
I agree to this.

I'll do it after the Holiday to avoid giving the CotC a headache.

And to avoid violating Rule 2157 (by causing the panel to violate its
obligation not to violate Rule 1769).  Ugh, now I have a headache, and
you probably do too.

Reply via email to