On Monday 31 December 2007 11:01:33 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Dec 31, 2007 10:54 AM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps have transactions self-ratify? :p > > It might be reasonable to have the actions self-ratify, but not the > assertions; it would be too much to force recordkeepors to keep track > of what assertions have been made and what their ratification statuses > are. > > The problem then is that if the actions self-ratify, but the > assertions don't, the transactions are no longer atomic. > > -root >
Perhaps: "An announcement may be made asserting the success or failure of a Transaction. This announcement is self-ratifying."?
