On Thursday 20 December 2007 07:51:28 Zefram wrote: > >Statement: submitting a protective decree to Steve Wallace is a violation > > of rule 2159 > > I note that this is asking about submitting a *real* protective decree, > not (as the prior discussion) about falsely claiming something to be a > protective decree. > > -zefram >
Shit. That's not what I meant by that. Trivially judged true, I guess. :/
