On Thursday 20 December 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 3:47 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hereby, in linked fashion, assign root as judge of CFJs 1837-1838. > > At the time that each of the alleged acts was committed, Rule 2149/7 > was in force, and it did proscribe the publication by a knight of a > statement believed by em to be false. The defendant has laid out in > eir defense that e did not at the time believe the statement to be > false, and I have no evidence to the contrary. I therefore rule > SLIPPERY in CFJs 1837 and 1838.
Wouldn't INNOCENT be more appropriate, then?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
