On Dec 20, 2007 10:46 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Amend Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) by replacing "Assessor" with
> > >"Accountor".
> >
> > Amendment fails: there are two separate instances of "Assessor" in
> > that rule. You must specify which instance(s) you want to replace.
> >
> In the absence of a specification it is reasonably implied that all
> instances should be replaced.
I disagree. That was clearly not the intent, as the table at the end
would then read:
Accountor - Red, Orange
IADoP - Green, Cyan
CotC - Blue, Black
Registrar - White
Herald - Violet, Indigo
Scorekeepor - Yellow
Accountor - all others
Besides the fact that it is more reasonable for the Assessor than the
Accountor to announce Red and Orange VC awards and penalties, it would
be strange to list the Accountor twice.
-root
