On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 20:43:10 Levi Stephen wrote: > > I'm happy that SLIPPERY was the appropriate decision. The defandant's > > assertion/admittance that the alleged act occured was not available at > > the time that judgement occured. Is REMAND appropriate if new evidence > > is available? > > It is reasonable to assume that there was evidence of the act when > Agora's Child submitted that CFJ. . . > Considering that I myself caused Agora's Child to do so. ;)
Perhaps I'm just tired, but I think it's kind of rude to not provide such evidence, such as a copy of the message in question.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
