On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:14:50 Taral wrote: > *giggle* > > On 12/18/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > WALRUS registers. > > WALRUS calls for judgement on the following (and ask for linked assignment): > > It is possible for a game action to take effect retroactively. > > It is possible for a contract change to take effect retroactively. > > It is possible for joining a contract to take effect retroactively. > > > > Arguments against: > > The rules are silent on this issue. By rule 217/6, game custom, common sense, > > and the best interests of the game augment the rules where the rule text is > > silent. > > Common sense dictates that no action can take effect before it occurs. > > Game custom dictates that actions take effect at the time of announcement. > > The best interests of the game dictate that creating such a radically > > changeable game-state is horrid, and trashes the game. > > > > I note that, if these are not judged TRUE, Fookiemyartug is not and never has > > been a player, a person, or even a contract. > > -- > Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." > -- Unknown >
You'll be giggling more if you know why I founded WALRUS. ;)
