On Sunday 16 December 2007, Taral wrote: > On 12/16/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Proposal 5354 (Democratic, AI=3, Interest=1) by Murphy > > MMI parallelism > > > > 5. MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the > > rule in question. > > Congratulations. Now everything is broken. Since MMI doesn't define > permission anymore, are these things regulated?
Unfortunately, it doesn't really break anything. Everything useful falls under R2125 (c), and game custom dictates that things that MAY be done CAN be done-- since the rules fail to supply a default.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
