On Tuesday 04 December 2007 13:49:54 comex wrote: > I hereby initiate the following criminal case, with Goethe as the > defendant, accusing em of violating Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) > claiming that I violated Rule 2149. The message-id of this claim is: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Arguments: > > The public message in question could be construed such that Goethe was > accusing me of violating Rule 2149. However, if e wanted me to be found > INNOCENT, presumably e did not actually believe that I violated the > rule. ;) > > On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I hereby initiate the following criminal case, with comex as the > > defendent, accusing em of violating Rule 2149 by recklessly (and > > falsely) claiming that I recklessly claimed a false thing. The > > message of comex's claim is: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > this precedent (I hope) will hold that players should be found > > INNOCENT of violating R2149 when they make statements on reasonable >
I hereby accuse you of abusing the right to trial.
