On Wednesday 28 November 2007 20:14:41 Benjamin Schultz wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2007, at 9:25 PM, comex wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 2007 9:22 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Benjamin Schultz wrote: > >>> The CotC web page has gratuitous arguments by pikhq of a sentence to > >>> APOLOGY. Am I correct that the only thing I must do on this CFJ is > >>> pick the required words for the apology? > >> > >> You must pass sentence. APOLOGY with a set of prescribed words is > >> one class of valid sentencing options. You're not restricted to > >> that, > >> though: you could instead hand down a sentence of CHOKEY, or > >> DISCHARGE, > >> for example. > > > > But it seems that this reassignment has been judged invalid. > > > Just in case it's not been reassigned, I proto sentence comex to an > apology, which shall include the following prescribed words (it's > okay to use standard modifiers to change word forms): > > anadromous > boeotian > factotum > hebdomedal > napiform > nothosonomia > oxter > quicunx > vermiculate > ... and any other word of at least six syllabes of eir choosing, that > is found in the latest edition of the OED. > ----- > Benjamin Schultz KE3OM > OscarMeyr >
Have fun with it. 死ぬ ころす 人肉 食べる 何 する 日本語 ;)
