On Wednesday 28 November 2007 18:15:36 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 5:49 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the defendant honestly believed that the judgement that e assigned > > was appropriate, I think e should be EXCUSED. Under the recent rule > > change, e could also be found UNAWARE, but EXCUSED covers it. > > I forgot about that. I change my recommendation to UNAWARE, which is > clearly appropriate whereas EXCUSED is questionable. > > -root >
Thank $diety for sensible changes to the rules.
