On Sunday 25 November 2007 20:19:14 Ed Murphy wrote: > pikhq wrote: > > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:07:15 Ed Murphy wrote: > > >> I also feel obliged to point out that I object to the repeal of > >> monthly decay. (I proposed monthly decay in the first place, to > >> prod Zefram to stop hoarding.) > >> > > > > I was introducing the harder VVLOP changes to *try* and reduce the effects of > > hoarding. . . And I'll do that in a bit. > > Wouldn't that actually increase hoarding? Or are you saying that > hoarding would happen, but wouldn't matter as much? I'll have to > think this one over. > >
The hoarding wouldn't matter as much is what I'm trying to say.
