Ian Kelly wrote: >What happens if the B Nomic rules are amended such that factions are >bound by the B Nomic rules?
Agora would morally have the option to cease being a B faction rather than become bound by B rules. For B to attempt to bind Agora without giving it such an option would be patently unreasonable and morally invalid, just as it would be if B were to unilaterally declare that Agora is bound by certain rules despite having no formal relationship with B. Legally, well, there's no applicable law at all. Using the sovereign states analogy, we're talking about international law here. Inter-nomic law is pretty much a blank slate at the moment. As far as Agoran law is concerned, Agora would not be bound by B law unless there were an enabling rule in the Agoran ruleset. -zefram
