On Sunday 18 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote: > It seems to me that CFJ1799 is actually about an *unregulated* action > (by rule 2125). By rule 101, every player has the right to perform > unregulated actions. Thus, this CFJ should *probably* be judged either > IRRELEVANT or TRUE. Because it is nonsensical, UNDECIDABLE is appropriate; see Rule 591.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
