Ed Murphy wrote: >Zefram wrote: >>I dislike this idea. > >Why?
I think it's not a naturally significant condition, but one that could be expected to occur in some perfectly ordinary circumstances. Attempts to avert such a win would induce people to make good proposals fail, which is a perverse behaviour that should not be encouraged. Contrast against the win for getting identical voting results on three proposals in a row, which we had years ago and which I protoed as a VC-gaining condition this year. That can be averted by a smaller perturbation of the voting, without changing the outcome of any proposal. -zefram
