Taral wrote: >Your arguments above are about UNDECIDABLE vs. IRRELEVANT. I am >arguing about UNDECIDABLE vs. FALSE. Did I miss something?
I have an argument for TRUE: rule 2158 only places the obligation to not assign an inappropriate judgement on judges. Anyone who is not a judge is not bound by that requirement. At the time the CFJ was called, which is the time at which the veracity of its statement is to be judged, it had no judge, and so there was no one under that obligation. Hence it was permitted, albeit impossible, to assign any valid judgement whatsoever. -zefram
