I'll support this intent if made publicly. The arguments raise several important issues of precedent (is this rule in conflict with R101? am I "informed" of contracts posted publicly before I'm a notary?) and this judgement doesn't help me perform my duties. -Goethe
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, comex wrote: > On 11/7/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The defendant is EXCUSED. > I intend to appeal this with two support on the grounds that Judge > Eris did not bother to make any arguments for eir judgement. >
