Kerim Aydin wrote: >*Sigh* Subject lines may give some guidance, but they are not >a substantive part of the message. (I'd say RTF case archive but >I can't find the case in question myself,
CFJ 1631. > we need a more effective >case archive or a way to search case texts hint hint). I find the FLR is pretty effective for this, due to its collation of relevant precedents. I did a text search for the word "subject". It could also be found by subject matter, as the annotation is one of eighteen attached to rule 478 "Fora". (This is where the annotations regarding interpretation of announcements go, because this is the rule that defines "by announcement".) Once you've got the case number from there, the archive is only needed for a straight lookup. > The message >taken in its own context is sufficient. I concur. comex's argument is poor, and if accepted would make it difficult to take game actions that had been previously protoed. -zefram
