On 10/21/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general, subsequent changes would be successful, as it would be > unambiguous which rule was intended to be amended (especially if the > subsequent proposals referred to them by both number and name).
If that's true, then the system is useless. We can just commonly refer to any of the rules using whatever number or label we want, and the regulation adds nothing but bureaucracy. -root
