Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:threshold defaults to the securing rule's power, but CAN be altered as allowed by that rule, up to a maximum of 1.1 times the securing rule's power.I think it's stupid to allow a threshold higher than the power of the defining rule. Such a threshold is trivially circumvented. But variable threshold in general is a good addition.
If the restriction comes from the securing rule, then circumventing it requires (SR's power + 0.1). If it comes from R1688, then circumventing it requires (SR's power * 1.1). Of course, these are not very different in practice, and thus not a strong argument for having the restriction come from R1688.
