On 10/3/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/3/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Amend Rule 2145 (Partnerships) by appending this text: > > > > A partnership's extended basis is the set consisting of the > > union of the set of its member persons with the extended > > bases of each of its partnership members. > > > > A partnership is second-class if its extended basis contains > > only non-players, third-class if its extended basis contains > > both players and non-players, or fourth-class if its extended > > basis contains only players. > > That seems backwards. > > Class: > 1 - player > 2 - partnership of players > 3 - partnership w/ player > 4 - partnership w/o players
Makes sense to me: 1 - (presumably individual) intelligent biological organism 2 - partnership not overlapping with any (other) players 3 - partnership overlapping with (other) players 4 - partnership totally overlapping with (other) players -root
