On 9/21/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/21/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ============================== CFJ 1740a ============================= > > > > Type: appeal case > > > > Prior question: 1740 sentencing > > Prior judgement: CHOKEY for 30 days > > Prior assignment date: 21 Sep 2007 05:31:33 GMT > > > > Initiator: BobTHJ > > > > ======================================================================== > > I think that the prior sentence seems reasonable, but I am also > willing to replace it with a sentence of APOLOGY, if the panel > consents. I suggest prescribing the words 'espalier', 'conjunctive', > 'stoat', 'ovation', 'hummer', 'engorgement', 'limature', 'paillard', > 'recusancy', and 'inaudibleness'. > > -root > Hmm....maybe Chokey wasn't such a bad sentence after all....
BobTHJ
