root wrote: > Well-formed or not, the message rendered perfectly for me (albeit in > Gmail, which is probably to be expected).
Should the archives have precedential status, even if not official? Read it through: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-September/007448.html If it can't be read from the archives, should that tell that it is beyond the "lowest common denominator" in terms of communication? It certainly obscures the historical record. (There have been past archive-mangling posts, but almost none that a reasonably intelligent person couldn't decode with reasonable effort such as reading between the tags). -Goethe
