Ed Murphy wrote:
>      For the purpose of this rule, a document is part or all of a
>      public message, and an official document is part or all of a
>      public message labeled as an official report.

It is possible to have a public message that contains only part of
an official report, and that should be ratifiable.  Also, a report is
the information abstractly, not the document in which that information
is published.  I suggest:

      For the purpose of this rule, a document is part or all of a
      public message, and an official document is a document that
      purports to be a publication of part or all of an official
      report.

>      Any player CAN, without objection, ratify part or all of an
>      official document.  The date of the most recent such ratification
>      becomes part of the official report in question.

Better be more explicit about the scope of "such ratification" when
ratification affects only part of an official report.

>      Any document defined by the rules as self-ratifying is ratified
>      one week after its publication, unless challenged during that
>      period.

Nice idea.

>Create a rule titled "Identity Theft" with Power 3 and this text:

Interesting.  That resolves a bunch of current issues.

-zefram

Reply via email to