Ed Murphy wrote: > For the purpose of this rule, a document is part or all of a > public message, and an official document is part or all of a > public message labeled as an official report.
It is possible to have a public message that contains only part of an official report, and that should be ratifiable. Also, a report is the information abstractly, not the document in which that information is published. I suggest: For the purpose of this rule, a document is part or all of a public message, and an official document is a document that purports to be a publication of part or all of an official report. > Any player CAN, without objection, ratify part or all of an > official document. The date of the most recent such ratification > becomes part of the official report in question. Better be more explicit about the scope of "such ratification" when ratification affects only part of an official report. > Any document defined by the rules as self-ratifying is ratified > one week after its publication, unless challenged during that > period. Nice idea. >Create a rule titled "Identity Theft" with Power 3 and this text: Interesting. That resolves a bunch of current issues. -zefram