Pavitra wrote: >> * <x> UNLESS <y>: <x> IF <not-y>. > >It makes more sense to me to say IFF than IF here.
In that case I'd say we definitely do need these to be precisely defined. -zefram
Pavitra wrote: >> * <x> UNLESS <y>: <x> IF <not-y>. > >It makes more sense to me to say IFF than IF here.
In that case I'd say we definitely do need these to be precisely defined. -zefram