comex wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
Eww.
I couldn't think of a better way to allow a player to be a Knight and a
Knave at the same time.
Smullyan is rolling over in his grave. Peekee is jumping for
joy, but you can't tell which ones are him and which ones are
just pointing and saying "That's me over there".
Ooh, tricky. Does "6000 FOR" count as a statement?
I don't see how this modification makes the issue (which could be CFJed)
any *more* relevant.
SHOULD NOT doesn't count as a rule violation.
