On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Zefram wrote: > R2161 is flawed in that it > does not discuss possibility, but is not actually broken. My proposed > amendment of MMI doesn't change this. Yes, it does. The current MMI does not define SHALL, so its ordinary language meaning applies. With your clarification SHALL is defined, and the following passage:
(respectively) of the contrary action. The terminology defined in this rule is used to govern each of these independently: anything said about one, using these terms, carries no implication regarding any of the others. would seem to clearly override game custom. > Please learn to trim what you quote. Please read any of my other messages to the agora lists before making such a statement.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
